4.7 Article

Efficacy and safety of once-weekly and twice-weekly bortezomib in patients with relapsed systemic AL amyloidosis: results of a phase 1/2 study

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages 865-873

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-334227

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc
  2. Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC
  3. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Special Program Molecular Clinical Oncology
  4. Instituto Carlos III [RD06/0020/0005, FIS 08/147]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This first prospective phase 2 study of single-agent bortezomib in relapsed primary systemic AL amyloidosis evaluated the recommended (maximum planned) doses identified in phase 1 testing (1.6 mg/m(2) once weekly [days 1, 8, 15, and 22; 35-day cycles]; 1.3 mg/m(2) twice weekly [days 1, 4, 8, and 11; 21-day cycles]). Among all 70 patients enrolled in the study, 44% had > 3 organs involved, including 73% and 56% with renal and cardiac involvement. In the 1.6 mg/m(2) once-weekly and 1.3 mg/m2 twice-weekly groups, the hematologic response rate was 68.8% and 66.7% (37.5% and 24.2% complete responses, respectively); median time to first/best response was 2.1/3.2 and 0.7/1.2 months, and 78.8% and 75.5% had response durations of > 1 year, respectively. One-year hematologic progression-free rates were 72.2% and 74.6%, and 1-year survival rates were 93.8% and 84.0%, respectively. Outcomes appeared similar in patients with cardiac involvement. Among all 70 patients, organ responses included 29% renal and 13% cardiac responses. Rates of grade>3 toxicities (79% vs 50%) and discontinuations/ dose reductions (38%/53% vs 28%/22%) resulting from toxicities appeared higher with 1.3 mg/m(2) twice-weekly versus 1.6 mg/m(2) once-weekly dosing. Both bortezomib dose schedules represent active, well-tolerated regimens in relapsed AL amyloidosis. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00298766. (Blood. 2011;118(4):865-873)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available