4.7 Article

Impact of gene dosage, loss of wild-type allele, and FLT3 ligand on Flt3-ITD-induced myeloproliferation

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 118, Issue 13, Pages 3613-3621

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-289207

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. EuroCancerStemCell
  2. EU
  3. Swedish Cancer Society
  4. Avtal om Lakerutbildning och Forskning (Government Public Health)
  5. Region Skane
  6. Goran Gustafsson's Foundation
  7. Hemato-Linne (Swedish Research Council)
  8. Torsten och Ragnar Soderbergs Foundation
  9. Medical Research Council, United Kingdom
  10. Swedish Pediatric Cancer Foundation
  11. Pasteur Institute of Iran
  12. Leukemia and Lymphoma Research
  13. Medical Research Council [G84/6443, G0801073, G0701761, G0900892, G0700711B] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. MRC [G84/6443, G0900892, G0701761, G0801073] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acquisition of homozygous activating growth factor receptor mutations might accelerate cancer progression through a simple gene-dosage effect. Internal tandem duplications (ITDs) of FLT3 occur in approximately 25% cases of acute myeloid leukemia and induce ligand-independent constitutive signaling. Homozygous FLT3-ITDs confer an adverse prognosis and are frequently detected at relapse. Using a mouse knockin model of Flt3-internal tandem duplication (Flt3-ITD)-induced myeloproliferation, we herein demonstrate that the enhanced myeloid phenotype and expansion of granulocyte-monocyte and primitive Lin(-)Sca1(+)c-Kit(+) progenitors in Flt3-ITD homozygous mice can in part be mediated through the loss of the second wild-type allele. Further, whereas autocrine FLT3 ligand production has been implicated in FLT3-ITD myeloid malignancies and resistance to FLT3 inhibitors, we demonstrate here that the mouse Flt3(ITD/ITD) myeloid phenotype is FLT3 ligand-independent. (Blood. 2011; 118(13):3613-3621)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available