4.7 Article

Gene mutation patterns and their prognostic impact in a cohort of 1185 patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 118, Issue 20, Pages 5593-5603

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-03-343988

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National High Tech Program for Biotechnology [863:2006AA02A405]
  2. Chinese National Key Basic Research Project [973: 2010CB529200]
  3. Mega-projects of Science Research [2008ZX09312-026]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30772744, 30830119, 30821063]
  5. Shanghai Municipal Commission for Science and Technology [10411965600]
  6. Shanghai Rising Star Program [11QA1404300]
  7. Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate the prognostic value of genetic mutations for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, we examined the gene status for both fusion products such as AML1 (CBF alpha)-ETO, CBF beta-MYH11, PML-RAR alpha, and MLL rearrangement as a result of chromosomal translocations and mutations in genes including FLT3, C-KIT, N-RAS, NPM1, CEBPA, WT1, ASXL1, DNMT3A, MLL, IDH1, IDH2, and TET2 in 1185 AML patients. Clinical analysis was mainly carried out among 605 cases without recognizable karyotype abnormalities except for 11q23. Of these 605 patients, 452 (74.7%) were found to have at least 1 mutation, and the relationship of gene mutations with clinical outcome was investigated. We revealed a correlation pattern among NPM1, DNMT3A, FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, CEBPA, and TET2 mutations. Multivariate analysis identified DNMT3A and MLL mutations as independent factors predicting inferior overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), whereas biallelic CEBPA mutations or NPM1 mutations without DNMT3A mutations conferred a better OS and EFS in both the whole group and among younger patients < 60 years of age. The use of molecular markers allowed us to subdivide the series of 605 patients into distinct prognostic groups with potential clinical relevance. (Blood. 2011;118(20):5593-5603)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available