4.7 Article

Leukemia regression by vascular disruption and antiangiogenic therapy

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 116, Issue 9, Pages 1539-1547

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-230474

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society [6264-08]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [K08 DK067359, R01 HL070738, CA089655, CA084408]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute myelogenous leukemias (AMLs) and endothelial cells depend on each other for survival and proliferation. Monotherapy antivascular strategies such as targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has limited efficacy in treating AML. Thus, in search of a multitarget antivascular treatment strategy for AML, we tested a novel vascular disrupting agent, OXi4503, alone and in combination with the anti-VEGF antibody, bevacizumab. Using xenotransplant animal models, OXi4503 treatment of human AML chloromas led to vascular disruption in leukemia cores that displayed increased leukemia cell apoptosis. However, viable rims of leukemia cells remained and were richly vascular with increased VEGF-A expression. To target this peripheral reactive angiogenesis, bevacizumab was combined with OXi4503 and abrogated viable vascular rims, thereby leading to enhanced leukemia regression. In a systemic model of primary human AML, OXi4503 regressed leukemia engraftment alone and in combination with bevacizumab. Differences in blood vessel density alone could not account for the ob-served regression, suggesting that OXi4503 also exhibited direct cytotoxic effects on leukemia cells. In vitro analyses confirmed this targeted effect, which was mediated by the production of reactive oxygen species and resulted in apoptosis. Together, these data show that OXi4503 alone is capable of regressing AML by a multitargeted mechanism and that the addition of bevacizumab mitigates reactive angiogenesis. (Blood. 2010;116(9):1539-1547)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available