4.7 Article

Adenosine A2A receptors induced on iNKT and NK cells reduce pulmonary inflammation and injury in mice with sickle cell disease

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 116, Issue 23, Pages 5010-5020

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-290643

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01 HL073361, R01HL095704]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We showed previously that pulmonary function and arterial oxygen saturation in NY1DD mice with sickle cell disease (SCD) are improved by depletion of invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells or blockade of their activation. Here we demonstrate that SCD causes a 9- and 6-fold induction of adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) mRNA in mouse pulmonary iNKT and natural killer (NK) cells, respectively. Treating SCD mice with the A(2A)R agonist ATL146e produced a dose-dependent reversal of pulmonary dysfunction with maximal efficacy at 10 ng/kg/minute that peaked within 3 days and persisted throughout 7 days of continuous infusion. Crossing NY1DD mice with Rag1(-/-) mice reduced pulmonary injury that was restored by adoptive transfer of 106 purified iNKT cells. Reconstituted injury was reversed by ATL146e unless the adoptively transferred iNKT cells were pretreated with theA(2A)R alkylating antagonist, FSPTP (5-amino-7-[2-(4-fluorosulfonyl) phenylethyl]-2-(2-furyl)-pryazolo[4,3-epsilon]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine), which completely prevented protection. In NY1DD mice exposed to hypoxia- reoxygenation, treatment with ATL146e at the start of reoxygenation prevented further lung injury. Together, these data indicate that activation of induced A(2A)Rs on iNKT and NK cells in SCD mice is sufficient to improve baseline pulmonary function and prevent hypoxia-reoxygenation-induced exacerbation of pulmonary injury. A(2A) agonists have promise for treating diseases associated with iNKT or NK cell activation. (Blood. 2010;116(23):5010-5020)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available