4.7 Article

Adenovirus capsid-display of the retro-oriented human complement inhibitor DAF reduces Ad vector-triggered immune responses in vitro and in vivo

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 116, Issue 10, Pages 1669-1677

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-276949

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. American Heart Association [0815660G]
  2. National Institutes of Health [RO1DK-069884, P01 CA078673]
  3. MSU Foundation
  4. Osteopathic Heritage Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adenovirus (Ad) vectors are widely used in human clinical trials. However, at higher dosages, Ad vector-triggered innate toxicities remain a major obstacle to many applications. Ad interactions with the complement system significantly contribute to innate immune responses in several models of Ad-mediated gene transfer. We constructed a novel class of Ad vectors, genetically engineered to capsid-display native and retro-oriented versions of the human complement inhibitor decay-accelerating factor (DAF), as a fusion protein from the C-terminus of the Ad capsid protein IX. In contrast to conventional Ad vectors, DAF-displaying Ads dramatically minimized complement activation in vitro and complement-dependent immune responses in vivo. DAF-displaying Ads did not trigger thrombocytopenia, minimized endothelial cell activation, and had diminished inductions of proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine responses. The retro-oriented display of DAF facilitated the greatest improvements in vivo, with diminished activation of innate immune cells, such as dendritic and natural killer cells. In conclusion, Ad vectors can capsid-display proteins in a manner that not only retains the functionality of the displayed proteins but also potentially can be harnessed to improve the efficacy of this important gene transfer platform for numerous gene transfer applications. (Blood. 2010; 116(10):1669-1677)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available