4.7 Article

Lymphomatoid gastropathy: a distinct clinicopathologic entity of self-limited pseudomalignant NK-cell proliferation

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 116, Issue 25, Pages 5631-5637

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-290650

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diagnostic errors in distinguishing between malignant and reactive processes can cause serious clinical consequences. We report 10 cases of unrecognized self-limited natural killer-cell proliferation in the stomach, designated as lymphomatoid gastropathy (LyGa). This study included 5 men and 5 women (age, 4675 years) without any gastric symptoms. Gastroscopy showed elevated lesion(s) (diameter, similar to 1 cm). Histologically, medium-sized to large atypical cells diffusely infiltrated the lamina propria and, occasionally, the glandular epithelium. The cells were CD2(+/-), sCD3(-), cCD3(+), CD4(-), CD5(-), CD7(+), CD8(-), CD16(-), CD20(-), CD45(+), CD56(+), CD117(-), CD158a(-), CD161(-), T cell-restricted intracellular antigen-1(+), granzyme B(+), perforin(+), Epstein-Barr early RNA(-), T-cell receptor alpha beta(-), and T-cell receptor gamma delta(-). Analysis of the 16 specimens biopsied from 10 patients led to a diagnosis of lymphoma or suspected lymphoma in 11 specimens, gastritis for 1 specimen, adenocarcinoma for 1 specimen, and LyGa or suspected LyGa for 3 specimens. Most lesions underwent self-regression. Three cases relapsed, but none of the patients died. According to conventional histopathologic criteria, LyGa is probably diagnosed as lymphoma, especially as extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. However, LyGa is recognized as a pseudomalignant process because of its clinical characteristics. The concept of LyGa should be well recognized. (Blood. 2010; 116(25): 5631-5637)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available