4.7 Article

Deregulation of Aiolos expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia is associated with epigenetic modifications

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 117, Issue 6, Pages 1917-1927

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-307140

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Inserm
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science
  3. French Minister of Education
  4. CNRS
  5. Institut Curie
  6. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche
  7. Association pour la recherche sur le Cancer
  8. Belgian InterUniversity Attraction Pole
  9. Canceropole Ile-de-France
  10. Institut National du Cancer
  11. Universite Paris Descartes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by a clonal accumulation of mature neoplastic B cells that are resistant to apoptosis. Aiolos, a member of the Ikaros family of zinc-finger transcription factors, plays an important role in the control of mature B lymphocyte differentiation and maturation. In this study, we showed that Aiolos expression is up-regulated in B-CLL cells. This overexpression does not implicate isoform imbalance or disturb Aiolos subcellular localization. The chromatin status at the Aiolos promoter in CLL is defined by the demethylation of DNA and an enrichment of euchromatin associated histone markers, such as the dimethylation of the lysine 4 on histone H3. These epigenetic modifications should allow its upstream effectors, such as nuclear factor-kappa B, constitutively activated in CLL, to gain access to promoter, resulting up-regulation of Aiolos. To determine the consequences of Aiolos deregulation in CLL, we analyzed the effects of Aiolos overexpression or down-regulation on apoptosis. Aiolos is involved in cell survival by regulating the expression of some Bcl-2 family members. Our results strongly suggest that Aiolos deregulation by epigenetic modifications may be a hallmark of CLL. (Blood. 2011; 117(6): 1917-1927)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available