4.7 Article

IL-7 and IL-21 are superior to IL-2 and IL-15 in promoting human T cell-mediated rejection of systemic lymphoma in immunodeficient mice

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 115, Issue 17, Pages 3508-3519

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-09-241398

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [CA59350]
  2. MSKCC, NIH MSTP [GM07739]
  3. Cancer Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The gamma(c)-cytokines are critical regulators of immunity and possess both overlapping and distinctive functions. However, comparative studies of their pleiotropic effects on human T cell-mediated tumor rejection are lacking. In a xenogeneic adoptive transfer model, we have compared the therapeutic potency of CD19-specific human primary T cells that constitutively express interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-7, IL-15, or IL-21. We demonstrate that each cytokine enhanced the eradication of systemic CD19(+) B-cell malignancies in non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID)/gamma(c) null mice with markedly different efficacies and through singularly distinct mechanisms. IL-7-and IL-21-transduced T cells were most efficacious in vivo, although their effector functions were not as enhanced as IL-2-and IL-15-transduced T cells. IL-7 best sustained in vitro T-cell accumulation in response to repeated antigenic stimulation, but did not promote long-term T-cell persistence in vivo. Both IL-15 and IL-21 overexpression supported long-term T-cell persistence in treated mice; however, the memory T cells found 100 days after adoptive transfer were phenotypically dissimilar, resembling central memory and effector memory T cells, respectively. These results support the use of gamma(c)-cytokines in cancer immunotherapy, and establish that there exists more than 1 human T-cell memory phenotype associated with long-term tumor immunity. (Blood. 2010; 115(17): 3508-3519)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available