4.5 Article

Phagocytosis-coupled flow cytometry for detection and size discrimination of anionic polystyrene particles

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 483, Issue -, Pages 40-46

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.04.034

Keywords

Agglomeration; Fluorescence; Macrophage; Microparticles; Nanoparticles; Phagocytosis

Funding

  1. Health Canada's Canadian Regulatory System for Biotechnology and Chemicals Management Plan-Nanotoxicology funding initiatives

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flow cytometry was evaluated for its capacity to detect and distinguish a wide size range (20-2000 nm) of fluorescent polystyrene particles (PSPs). Side scatter and fluorescence parameters could predict dispersed PSP sizes down to 200 nm, but the forward scatter parameter was not discriminatory. Confocal microscopy of flow-sorted fractions confirmed that dispersed PSPs appeared as a single sharp peak on fluorescence histograms, whereas agglomerated PSPs were detected as smaller adjacent peaks. Particles as small as 200 nm could also be detected by flow cytometry after they were first phagocytized by J774A.1 murine macrophages. Confocal microscopy demonstrated that these PSPs were internalized within the cytoplasm. MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] and calcein-AM (acetoxymethyl ester) assays showed that they were not cytotoxic. Internalized PSP size correlated to both cellular side scatter (R-2 = 0.9821) and fluorescence intensity (R-2 = 0.9993). Furthermore, PSPs of various sizes could be distinguished when J774A.1 cells were loaded with a single size of PSP and mixed with cells containing other sizes. However, spectra of cells loaded with a mixture of PSP sizes resembled those containing only the largest PSP. These data demonstrate the capacity and limitations of phagocytosis-coupled flow cytometry to distinguish between dispersed and agglomerated states and detect a wide size range of particles. Crown Copyright (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available