4.7 Review

A Review of the Emerging Field of Underwater Mass Spectrometry

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00209

Keywords

mass spectrometry; in situ instrumentation; ocean observation; biogeochemistry; environmental monitoring; dissolved gases; volatile organic compounds

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [OCE-1435690, OCE-1436040, OCE-1435605]
  2. Fulbright Canada
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Boston University
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1435690] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mass spectrometers are versatile sensor systems, owing to their high sensitivity and ability to simultaneously measure multiple chemical species. Over the last two decades, traditional laboratory-based membrane inlet mass spectrometers have been adapted for underwater use. Underwater mass spectrometry (UMS) has drastically improved our capability to monitor a broad suite of gaseous compounds (e.g., dissolved atmospheric gases, light hydrocarbons, and volatile organic compounds) in the aquatic environment. Here we provide an overview of the progress made in the field of UMS since its inception in the 1990s to the present. In particular, we discuss the approaches undertaken by various research groups in developing in situ mass spectrometers. We also provide examples to illustrate how underwater mass spectrometers have been used in the field. Finally, we present future trends in the field of in situ mass spectrometry. Most of these efforts are aimed at improving the quality and spatial and temporal scales of chemical measurements in the ocean. By providing up-to-date information on UMS, this review offers guidance for researchers interested in adapting this technology as well as goals for future progress in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available