4.7 Article

Frequent CBL mutations associated with 11q acquired uniparental disomy in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 113, Issue 24, Pages 6182-6192

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-194548

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Leukaemia Research (London, United Kingdom)
  2. Dr Mildred Scheel Stiftung fur Krebsforschung (Bonn, Germany)
  3. Lady Tata Memorial Trust (London, United Kingdom)
  4. Deutsche Krebshilfe eV (Bonn, Germany)
  5. Deutsche Jose Carreras Leukamie-Stiftung [eV-DJCLS R06/02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent evidence has demonstrated that acquired uniparental disomy (aUPD) is a novel mechanism by which pathogenetic mutations in cancer may be reduced to homozygosity. To help identify novel mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), we performed a genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) screen to identify aUPD in 58 patients with atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML; n = 30), JAK2 mutation-negative myelofibrosis (MF; n = 18), or JAK2 mutation-negative polycythemia vera (PV; n = 10). Stretches of homozygous, copy neutral SNP calls greater than 20Mb were seen in 10 (33%) aCML and 1 (6%) MF, but were absent in PV. In total, 7 different chromosomes were involved with 7q and 11q each affected in 10% of aCML cases. CBL mutations were identified in all 3 cases with 11q aUPD and analysis of 574 additional MPNs revealed a total of 27 CBL variants in 26 patients with aCML, myelofibrosis or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Most variants were missense substitutions in the RING or linker domains that abrogated CBL ubiquitin ligase activity and conferred a proliferative advantage to 32D cells overexpressing FLT3. We conclude that acquired, transforming CBL mutations are a novel and widespread pathogenetic abnormality in morphologically related, clinically aggressive MPNs. (Blood. 2009; 113: 6182-6192)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available