4.7 Article

Temporal and Spatial Variability of Wind Resources in the United States as Derived from the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 1166-1183

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00322.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station [11-JV-11242306-065]
  2. AgBioResearch of Michigan State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the spatial and temporal variability of wind speed at 80 m above ground (the average hub height of most modern wind turbines) in the contiguous United States using Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) data from 1979 to 2011. The mean 80-m wind exhibits strong seasonality and large spatial variability, with higher (lower) wind speeds in the winter (summer), and higher (lower) speeds over much of the Midwest and U.S. Northeast (U.S. West and Southeast). Trends are also variable spatially, with more upward trends in areas of the Great Plains and Intermountain West of the United States and more downward trends elsewhere. The leading EOF mode, which accounts for 20% (summer) to 33% (winter) of the total variance and represents in-phase variations across the United States, responds mainly to the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) in summer and El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENS 0) in the other seasons. The dominant variation pattern can be explained by a southerly/southwesterly (westerly) anomaly over the U.S. East (U.S. West) as a result of the anomalous mean sea level pressure (MSLP) pattern. The second EOF mode, which explains about 15% of the total variance and shows a seesaw pattern, is mainly related to the springtime Arctic Oscillation (AO), the summertime recurrent circumglobal teleconnection (CGT), the autumn Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO), and the winter El Nino Modoki. The anomalous jet stream and MSLP patterns associated with these indices are responsible for the wind variation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available