4.7 Article

Scl regulates the quiescence and the long-term competence of hematopoietic stem cells

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 115, Issue 4, Pages 792-803

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-201384

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Cancer Research Society Inc
  4. Canadian Research Chair program
  5. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec
  6. Cole foundation
  7. Institute of Research in Immunology and Cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The majority of long-term reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells (LT-HSCs) in the adult is in G(0), whereas a large proportion of progenitors are more cycling. We show here that the SCL/TAL1 transcription factor is highly expressed in LT-HSCs compared with short-term reconstituting HSCs and progenitors and that SCL negatively regulates the G(0)-G(1) transit of LT-HSCs. Furthermore, when SCL protein levels are decreased by gene targeting or by RNA interference, the reconstitution potential of HSCs is impaired in several transplantation assays. First, the mean stem cell activity of HSCs transplanted at approximately 1 competitive repopulating unit was 2-fold decreased when Scl gene dosage was decreased. Second, Scl(+/-) HSCs were at a marked competitive disadvantage with Scl(+/+) cells when transplanted at 4 competitive repopulating units equivalent. Third, reconstitution of the stem cell pool by adult HSCs expressing Scl-directed shRNAs was decreased compared with controls. At the molecular level, we found that SCL occupies the Cdkn1a and Id1 loci in primary hematopoietic cells and that the expression levels of these 2 regulators of HSC cell cycle and long-term functions are sensitive to Scl gene dosage. Together, our observations suggest that SCL impedes G(0)-G(1) transition in HSCs and regulates their long-term competence. (Blood. 2010;115:792-803)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available