Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.High incidence of false-positive PET scans in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with rituximab-containing regimens
H. S. Han et al.
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY (2009)
Response assessment after an inductive CHOP or CHOP-like regimen with or without rituximab in 103 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: integrating 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to the International Workshop Criteria
J. Dupuis et al.
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY (2009)
Early 18F-FDG PET for prediction of prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma:: SUV-based assessment versus visual analysis
Chieh Lin et al.
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (2007)
Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: Consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in lymphoma
Malik E. Juweid et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2007)
FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma
NG Mikhaeel et al.
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY (2005)
[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma:: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome
C Haioun et al.
BLOOD (2005)
Early restaging positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
K Spaepen et al.
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY (2002)
Share Paper
