4.2 Article

Direct and mediated effects of language and cognitive skills on comprehension of oral narrative texts (listening comprehension) for children

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 101-120

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.003

Keywords

Theory of mind; Inference; Listening comprehension; Text (narrative) comprehension; Comprehension monitoring; Grammar; Vocabulary; Working memory

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - South Korean government [NRF-2010-330-B00299]
  2. Institute of Education Sciences
  3. U.S. Department of Education [R305A130131]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated component language and cognitive skills of oral language comprehension of narrative texts (i.e., listening comprehension). Using the construction-integration model of text comprehension as an overarching theoretical framework, we examined direct and mediated relations of foundational cognitive skills (working memory and attention), foundational language skills (vocabulary and grammatical knowledge), and higher-order cognitive skills (inference, theory of mind, and comprehension monitoring) to listening comprehension. A total of 201 first grade children in South Korea participated in the study. Structural equation modeling results showed that listening comprehension is directly predicted by working memory, grammatical knowledge, inference, and theory of mind and is indirectly predicted by attention, vocabulary, and comprehension monitoring. The total effects were .46 for working memory, .07 for attention, .30 for vocabulary, .49 for grammatical knowledge, .31 for inference, .52 for theory of mind, and .18 for comprehension monitoring. These results suggest that multiple language and cognitive skills make contributions to listening comprehension, and their contributions are both direct and indirect. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available