4.7 Article

Chromosome looping at the human α-globin locus is mediated via the major upstream regulatory element (HS-40)

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 114, Issue 19, Pages 4253-4260

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-213439

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Center Program
  3. MRC [MC_U137961144] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_U137961144, G0700711B] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies in the mouse have shown that high levels of alpha-globin gene expression in late erythropoiesis depend on long-range, physical interactions between remote upstream regulatory elements and the globin promoters. Using quantitative chromosome conformation capture (q3C), we have now analyzed all interactions between 4 such elements lying 10 to 50 kb upstream of the human alpha cluster and their interactions with the alpha-globin promoter. All of these elements interact with the alpha-globin gene in an erythroid-specific manner. These results were confirmed in a mouse model of human alpha globin expression in which the human cluster replaces the mouse cluster in situ (humanized mouse). We have also shown that expression and all of the long-range interactions depend largely on just one of these elements; removal of the previously characterized major regulatory element (called HS -40) results in loss of all the interactions and alpha-globin expression. Reinsertion of this element at an ectopic location restores both expression and the intralocus interactions. In contrast to other more complex systems involving multiple upstream elements and promoters, analysis of the human alpha-globin cluster during erythropoiesis provides a simple and tractable model to understand the mechanisms underlying long-range gene regulation. (Blood. 2009; 114: 4253-4260)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available