4.4 Article

The Association of Health Literacy with Health Behavior, Socioeconomic Indicators, and Self-Assessed Health From a National Adult Survey in Israel

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages 61-68

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1207115

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a growing need to understand how health literacy influences health outcomes in diverse populations. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between health literacy, health behavior, sociodemographic indicators, and self-assessed health in the adult population in Israel while identifying populations at risk for low health literacy. A cross-sectional national survey was conducted among 600 adults randomly selected from a national database. The Health Literacy Survey-Europe-Q16 (HLS-EU-Q16) research instrument, adapted for use in Israel, was the basis for home interviews in Hebrew, Russian, and Arabic. Three levels of health literacy were distinguished: More than 31% of the sample had inadequate or problematic health literacy, and 69% showed likely sufficient health literacy. Logistic regression analyses showed that after we controlled for other determinants, years of education (beta = 1.8) and income (beta = 2.2) were significantly associated with health literacy. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that health literacy, along with age, was the strongest independent variable associated with self-assessed health. Thus, health literacy, strongly influenced by income and years of education, may play a key role in determining self-assessed health, a proxy health outcome, beyond sociodemographic variables. The study results contribute to understanding the role of health literacy in health disparities and identifying action areas for health promotion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available