4.2 Article

Rural Active Living: A Call to Action

Journal

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages E11-E20

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000333

Keywords

ecological model; health disparities; physical activity; rural

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [U54CA153719, R21HL121692]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U54CA153719] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R21HL121692] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rural residents are less physically active than their urban counterparts and disproportionately affected by chronic diseases and conditions associated with insufficient activity. While the ecological model has been successful in promoting and translating active living research in urban settings, relatively little research has been conducted in rural settings. The resulting research gap prohibits a comprehensive understanding and application of solutions for active living in rural America. Therefore, the purpose of this article was to assess the evidence base for an ecological model of active living for rural populations and outline key scientific gaps that inhibit the development and application of solutions. Specifically, we reexamined the 4 domains conceptualized by the model and suggest that there is a dearth of research specific to rural communities across all areas of the framework. Considering the limited rural-specific efforts, we propose areas that need addressing to mobilize rural active living researchers and practitioners into action.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available