4.7 Article

Fibrinolytic cross-talk: a new mechanism for plasmin formation

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 115, Issue 10, Pages 2048-2056

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-228817

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Inserm
  2. Lower-Normandy Regional Council
  3. European Community [201024]
  4. Excellentie financiering, KULeuven
  5. Nouvelle Societe Francaise d'Atherosclerose
  6. Education and Research French Ministry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fibrinolysis and pericellular proteolysis depend on molecular coassembly of plasminogen and its activator on cell, fibrin, or matrix surfaces. We report here the existence of a fibrinolytic cross-talk mechanism bypassing the requirement for their molecular coassembly on the same surface. First, we demonstrate that, despite impaired binding of Glu-plasminogen to the cell membrane by epsilon-aminocaproic acid (epsilon-ACA) or by a lysine-binding site-specific mAb, plasmin is unexpectedly formed by cell-associated urokinase (uPA). Second, we show that Glu-plasminogen bound to carboxy-terminal lysine residues in platelets, fibrin, or extracellular matrix components (fibronectin, laminin) is transformed into plasmin by uPA expressed on monocytes or endothelial cell-derived microparticles but not by tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) expressed on neurons. A 2-fold increase in plasmin formation was observed over activation on the same surface. Altogether, these data indicate that cellular uPA but not tPA expressed by distinct cells is specifically involved in the recognition of conformational changes and activation of Glu-plasminogen bound to other biologic surfaces via a lysine-dependent mechanism. This uPA-driven cross-talk mechanism generates plasmin in situ with a high efficiency, thus highlighting its potential physiologic relevance in fibrinolysis and matrix proteolysis induced by inflammatory cells or cell-derived microparticles. (Blood. 2010; 115: 2048-2056)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available