4.7 Article

High Id1 expression is associated with poor prognosis in 237 patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 114, Issue 14, Pages 2993-3000

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-223115

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Tumorotheque Leucemies
  2. Hopital Hotel-Dieu
  3. Inserm
  4. Universite Pierre et Marie Curie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inhibitors of differentiation (Id) are a group of dominant inhibitors of basic helix-loop-helix transcriptional factors, which promote excessive proliferation, and also protect cells against drug-induced apoptosis in mammalians. Recently, Id1 has been identified as a common downstream target of several constitutively activated oncogenic tyrosine kinase, such as FLT3 internal tandem duplication, in leukemia cells. We analyzed Id1 expression as possible prognostic factor in 237 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. High Id1 expression was associated with older age (P=.009) and with FLT3 internal tandem duplication (P=.003). However, 61% of the patients in the group of FLT3(-) AML were Id1(+), suggesting that other tyrosine kinases are involved. In whole population, high Id1 expression independently predicted shorter disease-free survival (P=.05) and overall survival (P=.003). In young patients (age <= 60 years) with normal cytogenetics, Id1(+) was, in multivariate analysis, associated with lower complete remission rates (P=.02), shorter disease-free survival (P=.02), and overall survival (P=.006). In conclusion, our data provide a new molecular marker for refining the risk classification of AML, especially in young patients with normal cytogenetic. Id1(-) patients with normal cytogenetic should be classified as favorable-risk leukemia. Id1, as a downstream target of constitutively activated tyrosine kinase, could be a suitable candidate for targeted therapy. (Blood. 2009; 114: 2993-3000)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available