4.7 Article

TLR8-dependent TNF-α overexpression in Fanconi anemia group C cells

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 114, Issue 26, Pages 5290-5298

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-222414

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
  2. National Cancer Institute
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs
  4. Fanconi Anemia Research Fund Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) production is abnormally high in Fanconi anemia (FA) cells and contributes to the hematopoietic defects seen in FA complementation group C-deficient (Fancc(-/-)) mice. Applying gene expression microarray and proteomic methods to studies on FANCC-deficient cells we found that genes encoding proteins directly involved in ubiquitinylation are overrepresented in the signature of FA bone marrow cells and that ubiquitinylation profiles of FA-C and complemented cells were substantially different. Finding that Toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8) was one of the proteins ubiquitinylated only in mutant cells, we confirmed that TLR8 (or a TLR8-associated protein) is ubiquitinylated in mutant FA-C cells and that TNF-alpha production in mutant cells depended upon TLR8 and the canonical downstream signaling intermediates interleukin 1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) and I kappa B kinase-alpha/beta. FANCC-deficient THP-1 cells and macrophages from Fancc(-/-) mice overexpressed TNF-alpha in response to TLR8 agonists but not other TLR agonists. Ectopically expressed FANCC point mutants were capable of fully complementing the mitomycin-C hypersensitivity phenotype of FA-C cells but did not suppress TNF-alpha overproduction. In conclusion, FANCC suppresses TNF-alpha production in mononuclear phagocytes by suppressing TLR8 activity and this particular function of FANCC is independent of its function in protecting the genome from cross-linking agents. (Blood. 2009; 114: 5290-5298)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available