4.7 Article

A risk-adapted, response-based approach using ABVE-PC for children and adolescents with intermediate- and high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma: the results of P9425

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 114, Issue 10, Pages 2051-2059

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-10-184143

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Chair's [U10 CA98543]
  2. Statistics and Data Center [U10 CA98413]
  3. National Cancer Institute
  4. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current treatment strategies for Hodgkin lymphoma result in excellent survival but often confer significant long-term toxicity. We designed ABVE-PC ( doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, cyclophosphamide) to ( 1) enhance treatment efficacy by dose-dense drug delivery and ( 2) reduce risk of long-term sequelae by response-based reduction of cumulative chemotherapy. Efficient induction of early response by dose-dense drug delivery supported an early-response-adapted therapeutic para-digm. The 216 eligible patients were younger than 22 years with intermediateor high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma. ABVE-PC was administered every 21 days. Rapid early responders (RERs) to 3 ABVE-PC cycles received 21 Gy radiation to involved regions; RER was documented in 63% of patients. Slow early responders received 2 additional ABVE-PC cycles before 21 Gy radiation. Five-year event-free-survival was 84%: 86% for the RER and 83% for the slow early responders (P = .85). Only 1% of patients had progressive disease. Five-year overall survival was 95%. With this regimen, cumulative doses of alkylators, anthracyclines, and epipodophyllotoxins are below thresholds usually associated with significant long-term toxicity. ABVE-PC is a dose-dense regimen that provides outstanding event-free survival/overall survival with short duration, early-response-adapted therapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00005578. (Blood. 2009; 114: 2051-2059)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available