4.7 Article

Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 112, Issue 10, Pages 4017-4023

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-159624

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Cooperative Research Thematic Network [RD06/0020/0006]
  2. MM Jevitt
  3. SL firm
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III/Subdireccion General de Investigacion Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain [PI060339, 02/0905, 01/0089/01-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment is standard in many hematologic malignancies but is considered investigational in multiple myeloma (MM). We report a prospective analysis of the prognostic importance of MRD detection by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in 295 newly diagnosed MM patients uniformly treated in the GEM2000 protocol VBMCP/VBAD induction plus autologous stem cell transplantation [ASCT]). MRD status by MFC was determined at day 100 after ASCT. Progression-free survival (PFS; median 71 vs 37 months, P < .001) and overall survival (OS; median not reached vs 89 months, P = .002) were longer in patients who were MRD negative versus MRD positive at day 100 after ASCT. Similar prognostic differentiation was seen in 147 patients who achieved immunofixation-negative complete response after ASCT. Moreover, MRD- immunofixation-negative (IFx(-)) patients and MRD- IFx(+) patients had significantly longer PFS than MRD+ IFx(-) patients. Multivariate analysis identified MRD status by MFC at day 100 after ASCT as the most important independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 3.64, P = .002) and OS (HR = 2.02, P = .02). Our findings demonstrate the clinical importance of MRD evaluation by MFC, and illustrate the need for further refinement of MM response criteria. This trial is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov under identifier NCT00560053. (Blood. 2008; 112: 4017-4023)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available