4.7 Article

Low plasma levels of tissue factor pathway inhibitor in patients with congenital factor V deficiency

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages 3615-3623

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-06-162453

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO
  2. Amsterdam, The Netherlands) [917-76-312]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Severe factor V (FV) deficiency is associated with mild to severe bleeding diathesis, but many patients with FV levels lower than 1% bleed less than anticipated. We used calibrated automated thrombography to screen patients with severe FV deficiency for protective procoagulant defects. Thrombin generation in FV-deficient plasma was only measurable at high tissue factor concentrations. Upon reconstitution of FV-deficient plasma with purified FV, thrombin generation increased steeply with FV concentration, reaching a plateau at approximately 10% FV. FV-deficient plasma reconstituted with 100% FV generated severalfold more thrombin than normal plasma, especially at low tissue factor concentrations (1.36 pM) or in the presence of activated protein C, suggesting reduced tissue factor pathway inhibitor ( TFPI) levels in FV-deficient plasma. Plasma TFPI antigen and activity levels were indeed lower (P <.001) in FV-deficient patients (n = 11; 4.0 +/- 1.0 ng/mL free TFPI) than in controls (n = 20; 11.5 +/- 4.8 ng/mL), while persons with partial FV deficiency had intermediate levels (n = 16; 7.9 +/- 2.5 ng/mL). FV immunodepletion experiments in normal plasma and surface plasmon resonance analysis provided evidence for the existence of a FV/TFPI complex, possibly affecting TFPI stability/clearance in vivo. Low TFPI levels decreased the FV requirement for minimal thrombin generation in FV-deficient plasma to less than 1% and might therefore protect FV-deficient patients from severe bleeding. (Blood. 2008; 112: 3615-3623)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available