4.7 Article

IL-7 and IL-15 allow the generation of suicide gene-modified alloreactive self-renewing central memory human T lymphocytes

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 113, Issue 5, Pages 1006-1015

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-156059

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health
  2. Italian Ministry of Research and University
  3. Fondazione Cariplo
  4. Italian Association for Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long-term clinical remissions of leukemia, after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, depend on alloreactive memory T cells able to self-renew and differentiate into antileukemia effectors. This is counterbalanced by detrimental graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Induction of a selective suicide in donor T cells is a current gene therapy approach to abrogate GVHD. Unfortunately, genetic modification reduces alloreactivity of lymphocytes. This associates with an effector memory (T-EM) phenotype of gene-modified lymphocytes and may limit antileukemia effect. We hypothesized that alloreactivity of gene-modified lymphocytes segregates with the central memory (T-CM) phenotype. To this, we generated suicide gene-modified T-CM lymphocytes with a retroviral vector after CD28 costimulation and culture with IL-2, IL-7, or a combination of IL-7 and IL-15. In vitro, suicide gene-modified T-CM cells self-renewed upon alloantigen stimulation and resisted activation-induced cell death. In a humanized mouse model, only suicide gene -modified T cells cultured with IL-7 and IL-15 persisted, differentiated in T-EM cells, and were as potent as unmanipulated lymphocytes in causing GVHD. GVHD was halted through the activation of the suicide gene machinery. These results warrant the use of suicide gene modified T-CM cells cultured with IL-7 and IL-15 for the safe exploitation of the alloreactive response against cancer. (Blood. 2009;113:1006-1015)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available