4.7 Article

A genome-wide scan for common genetic variants with a large influence on warfarin maintenance dose

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 112, Issue 4, Pages 1022-1027

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-134247

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [U01 HL065962, U01 HL65962] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM068797, U01GM074492, U01 GM074492, GM68797] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS053646, NS053646] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Warfarin dosing is correlated with polymorphisms in vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 (VKORC1) and the cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) genes. Recently, the FDA revised warfarin labeling to raise physician awareness about these genetic effects. Randomized clinical trials are underway to test genetically based dosing algorithms. It is thus important to determine whether common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in other gene(s) have a large effect on warfarin dosing. A retrospective genome-wide association study was designed to identify polymorphisms that could explain a large fraction of the dose variance. White patients from an index warfarin population (n = 181) and 2 independent replication patient populations (n = 374) were studied. From the approximately 550 000 polymorphisms tested, the most significant independent effect was associated with VKORC1 polymorphisms (P = 6.2 x 10(-13)) in the index patients. CYP2C9 (rs1057910 CYP2C9*3) and rs4917639) was associated with dose at moderate significance levels (p similar to 10(-4)). Replication polymorphisms (355 SNPs) from the index study did not show any significant effects in the replication patient sets. We conclude that common SNPs with large effects on warfarin dose are unlikely to be discovered outside of the CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genes. Randomized clinical trials that account for these 2 genes should therefore produce results that are definitive and broadly applicable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available