4.7 Article

Identification of genetic polymorphisms associated with risk for pulmonary hypertension in sickle cell disease

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages 5721-5726

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-02-074849

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [U54 HL070769, R01HL79915, HL070769, R01 HL068959, R01 HL079915, R01HL68959, U54HL070769] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R21DK066605, R21 DK066605] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Up to 30% of adult patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) will develop pulmonary hypertension (pHTN), a complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. To identify genetic factors that contribute to risk for pHTN in SCD, we performed association analysis with 297 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 49 candidate genes in patients with sickle cell anemia (Hb SS) who had been screened for pHTN by echocardiography (n = 111). Evidence of association was primarily identified for genes in the TGF beta superfamily, including activin A receptor, type II-like 1 (ACVRL1), bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2 (BMPR2), and bone morphogenetic protein 6 (BMP6). The association of pHTN with ACVRL1 and BMPR2 corroborates the previous association of these genes with primary pHTN. Moreover, genes in the TGF beta pathway have been independently implicated in risk for several sickle cell complications, suggesting that this gene pathway is important in overall sickle cell pathophysiology. Genetic variation in the beta-1 adrenergic receptor (ADRB1) was also associated with pHTN in our dataset. A multiple regression model, which included age and baseline hemoglobin as covariates, retained SNPs in ACVRL1, BMP6, and ADRB1 as independently contributing to pHTN risk. These findings may offer new promise for identifying patients at risk for pHTN, developing new therapeutic targets, and reducing the occurrence of this life-threatening SCD complication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available