4.7 Article

Overnight transduction with foamyviral vectors restores the long-term repopulating activity of Fancc-/- stem cells

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 112, Issue 12, Pages 4458-4465

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-07-102947

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD) [PPG-P01-HL533586]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bonn, Germany) [SPP1230]
  3. Riley Children's Foundation (Indianapolis, IN)
  4. Indiana University NCI-designated Cancer Center (Indianapolis, IN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a complex genetic disorder characterized by congenital abnormalities, bone marrow failure, and myeloid malignancies. Identification of 13 FA genes has been instrumental to explore gene transfer technologies aimed at correction of autologous FA-deficient stem cells. To date, 3 human FA stem cell gene therapy trials with standard 4-day transduction protocols using gammaretroviral vectors failed to provide clinical benefit. In addition, 2- to 4 day ex vivo manipulation of bone marrow from mice containing a disruption of the homologue of human FANCC (Fancc) results in a timedependent increase in apoptosis and a risk for malignant transformation of hematopoietic cells. Here, we show that a 14-hour transduction period allows a foamyviral vector construct expressing the human FANCC cDNA to efficiently transduce murine FA stem cells with 1 to 2 proviral integrations per genome. Functionally, the repopulating activity of Fancc(-/-) stem cells from reconstituted mice expressing the recombinant FANCC transgene was comparable with wild-type controls. Collectively, these data provide evidence that short-term transduction of c-kit(+) cells with a foamyviral vector is sufficient for functional correction of a stem cell phenotype in a murine FAmodel. These data could have implications for future gene therapy trials for FA patients. (Blood. 2008;112:4458-4465)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available