4.7 Article

Thalidomide and rituximab in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 112, Issue 12, Pages 4452-4457

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-150854

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Peter and Helen Bing Fund
  2. Research Fund for Waldenstrom at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  3. National Institutes of Health Career Development Award [K23CA087977-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thalidomide enhances rituximab-mediated, antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity. We therefore conducted a phase 2 study using thalidomide and rituximab in symptomatic Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) patients naive to either agent. Intended therapy consisted of daily thalidomide (200 mg for 2 weeks, then 400 mg for 50 weeks) and rituximab (375 mg/m(2) per week) dosed on weeks 2 to 5 and 13 to 16. Twenty-five patients were enrolled, 20 of whom were untreated. Responses were complete response (n = 1), partial response (n = 15), and major response (n = 2), for overall and major response rate of 72% and 64%, respectively, on an intent-to-treat basis. Median serum IgM decreased from 3670 to 1590 mg/dL (P < .001), whereas median hematocrit rose from 33.0% to 37.6% (P = .004) at best response. Median time to progression for responders was 38 months. Peripheral neuropathy to thalidomide was the most common adverse event. Among 11 patients experiencing grade 2 or greater neuropathy, 10 resolved to grade 1 or less at a median of 6.7 months. Thalidomide in combination with rituximab is active and produces long-term responses in WM. Lower doses of thalidomide (ie, <= 200 mg/day) should be considered given the high frequency of treatment-related neuropathy in this patient population. This trial is registered at www. clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00142116. (Blood. 2008;112:4452-4457)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available