4.7 Article

Solid cancers after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 113, Issue 5, Pages 1175-1183

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-158782

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U24-CA76518, U24 CA076518] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [U01 HL069294, 5U01HL069294] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [HHSH234200637015C] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transplant recipients have been reported to have an increased risk of solid cancers but most studies are small and have limited ability to evaluate the interaction of host, disease, and treatment-related factors. In the largest study to date to evaluate risk factors for solid cancers, we studied a multi-institutional cohort of 28 874 allogeneic transplant recipients with 189 solid malignancies. Overall, patients developed new solid cancers at twice the rate expected based on general population rates (observed-to-expected ratio 2.1; 95% confidence interval 1.8-2.5), with the risk increasing over time (P trend <.001); the risk reached 3-fold among patients followed for 15 years or more after transplantation. New findings showed that the risk of developing a non-squamous cell carcinoma (non-SCC) following conditioning radiation was highly dependent on age at exposure. Among patients irradiated at ages under 30 years, the relative risk of non-SCC was 9 times that of nonirradiated patients, while the comparable risk for older patients was 1.1 (P interaction <.01). Chronic graft-versus-host disease and male sex were the main determinants for risk of SCC. These data indicate that allogeneic transplant survivors, particularly those irradiated at young ages, face increased risks of solid cancers, supporting strategies to promote lifelong surveillance among these patients. (Blood. 2009; 113:1175-1183)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available