4.6 Article

Nitrogen doped graphene supported alpha-MnO2 nanorods for efficient ORR in a microbial fuel cell

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 6, Issue 111, Pages 110091-110101

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra23392a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (New Indigo Project) [DST/IMRCD/NewIndigo/Bio-e-MAT/2014/(G)/(ii)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is one of the rate-limiting processes in MFCs. The development of highly active, cost-effective, scalable, and durable catalysts for ORR in MFCs is a challenging task. In this work, we have developed alpha-MnO2 nanorods (MN), alpha-MnO2 nanorods supported on reduced graphene oxide (MN/rGO), and alpha-MnO2 nanorods supported on nitrogen doped reduced graphene oxide (MN/NrGO) through a facile one-step hydrothermal method. The as-prepared electrocatalysts are characterized for morphological and structural evaluation along with electrochemical characterizations. The electrochemical properties of as-prepared catalysts have been investigated through rotating disc electrode (RDE) studies, which confirm that both MN/NrGO and MN/rGO exhibit higher current density, more positive onset potential, and a higher number of electron transfers as compared to both pure rGO and MN individually. The experiments are conducted in a novel MFC having a modular air cathode. Electrochemical performance studies show that the MFCs having a cathode coated with MN/NrGO and MN/rGO electrocatalysts, at a very low loading of 0.5 mg cm(-2), produce maximum power densities of 135.27 mW m(-2) and 85.45 mW m(-2), respectively, which is significantly higher as compared to pure rGO (57.63 mW m(-2)) and MN (45.56 mW m(-2)) electrocatalysts. These results illustrate that MN/NrGO electrocatalysts are potentially efficient and cost effective cathode catalysts for their practical application in MFCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available