4.7 Article

Intraarticular factor IX protein or gene replacement protects against development of hemophilic synovitis in the absence of circulating factor IX

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 112, Issue 12, Pages 4532-4541

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-131417

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NHLBI PPG: PO1 HL66973]
  2. National Hemophilia Foundation
  3. Hemophilia of Georgia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hemophilic bleeding into joints causes synovial and microvascular proliferation and inflammation (hemophilic synovitis) that contribute to end-stage joint degeneration (hemophilic arthropathy), the major morbidity of hemophilia. New therapies are needed for joint deterioration that progresses despite standard intravenous (IV) clotting factor replacement. To test whether factor IX within the joint space can protect joints from hemophilic synovitis, we established a hemophilia B mouse model of synovitis. Factor IX knockout (FIX-/-) mice received a puncture of the knee joint capsule with a needle to induce hemarthrosis; human factor IX (hFIX) was either injected through the needle into the joint space (intraarticularly) or immediately delivered IV. FIX-/- mice receiving intraarticular FIX protein were protected from synovitis compared with mice receiving same or greater doses of hFIX IV. Next, adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene transfer vectors expressing hFIX were injected into knee joints of FIX-/- mice. Joints treated with 1010 vector genomes (vg)/joint AAV2-, AAV5-, or AAV8-hFIX or 2.5 x 10(9) vg/joint AAV5-hFIX developed significantly fewer pathologic changes 2 weeks after injury compared with the pathology of control injured contralateral hind limbs. Extravascular factor activity and joint-directed gene transfer may ameliorate hemophilic joint destruction, even in the absence of circulating FIX. (Blood. 2008; 112: 4532-4541)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available