4.6 Article

A facile method for transparent carbon nanosheets heater based on polyimide

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 6, Issue 58, Pages 52509-52517

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra07457j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) [2Z04700]
  2. Converging Research Center Program - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning Technology [2014M3C1A8054009]
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2014R1A1A1002636]
  4. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy of Korea [2MR3560]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant - Korean Government (MOE) [2013R1A1A2A10010080]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a novel film heater in nanometer-scale thickness based on catalyst-free and transfer-free carbon nanosheets (CNSs) with properties similar to graphene is fabricated. Here, poly(amic acid) (PAA), which is composed of several aromatic hydrocarbon rings, is used as the carbon precursor of CNS films. Altering the polymer concentration easily controls the morphological, optical, and electrical properties of the CNS films obtained by carbonization of PAA thin films. The CNS films with different thicknesses of 7.53-28.40 nm are simply prepared through spin-coating on a quartz substrate and post heat-treatment. Finally, their direct use as transparent film heaters is deeply investigated by considering electrical conductivity, temperature response rapidity, achievable maximum temperature, and electric power efficiency. For instance, an electrically conductive and optically transparent CNS film with 28.40 nm thickness exhibits excellent electric heating performance achieving well-defined steady-state maximum temperatures of 24-333 degrees C at low input electric power per unit film area of 0.027-1.005 W cm(-2) in a relatively short time of similar to 100 s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available