4.6 Article

Fate of tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole and their corresponding resistance genes in microbial fuel cell coupled constructed wetlands

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 6, Issue 98, Pages 95999-96005

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra20509g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41571476]
  2. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu, China [BK20141117]
  3. Provincial Key Technologies RAMP
  4. D Program of Jiangsu, China [BE2015358]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pollution by antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes has become a major health concern. A microbial fuel cell coupled constructed wetland (CW-MFC) is a new installation to simultaneously treat wastewater and produce energy. This study was conducted to assess the removal efficiency of tetracycline (TC) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and the development of TC and SMX resistance genes (tetA, tetC, tetO, tetQ, tetW, suII and suIII) in the CW-MFCs. At the same time, electricity was also produced during the co-metabolism of the antibiotics and glucose. The results indicated that the CW-MFCs could significantly reduce the concentration of TC and SMX in wastewater. Accumulation of antibiotics and the relative abundances of the tet and sul genes in different layers of the CW-MFCs were: anode layer > cathode layer > middle layer > effluent. The relative abundances of ARGs in the substrates ranged from 1.40 x 10(-4) to 6.30 x 10(-1) for tet genes and 5.58 x 10(-3) to 9.27 x 10(-2) for sul genes. The relative abundances of the tetC, tetQ, TetW, sulI and suIII genes were significantly affected by the antibiotics in effluent of the CW-MFCs. In addition, the highest power density obtained under the external resistance of 1000 Omega was 0.0578 W m(-2) . However, an obvious drop of power density was observed when the antibiotic concentrations increased from 400 to 1600 mu g L-1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available