4.7 Article

Genomic complexity identifies patients with aggressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 112, Issue 5, Pages 1993-2003

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-07-099432

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of America Special Fellow Award
  2. National Institutes of Health [1 R21 CA124420-01A1]
  3. University of Michigan's Cancer Center Support Grant [5 P30 CA46592]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has a variable clinical course. Presence of specific genomic aberrations has been shown to impact survival outcomes and can help categorize CLL into clinically distinct subtypes. We studied 178 CLL patients enrolled in a prospective study at the University of Michigan, of whom 139 and 39 were previously untreated and previously treated, respectively. We obtained unbiased, high-density, genome-wide measurements of subchromosomal copy number changes in highly purified DNA from sorted CD19(+) cells and buccal cells using the Affymetrix 50kXbal SNP array platform (Santa Clara, CA). Genomic complexity scores were derived and correlated with the surrogate clinical end points time to first therapy (TTFT) and time to subsequent therapy (TTST): measures of disease aggressiveness and/or therapy efficaciousness. In univariate analysis, progressively increasing complexity scores in previously untreated CLL patients identified patients with short TTFT at high significance levels. Similarly, TTST was significantly shorter in pretreated patients with high as opposed to low genomic complexity. In multivariate analysis, genomic complexity emerged as an independent risk factor for short TTFT and TTST Finally, algorithmic subchromosomal complexity determination was developed, facilitating automation and future routine clinical application of CLL whole-genome analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available