4.6 Article

Survival outcomes after radical and partial nephrectomy for clinical T2 renal tumours categorised by RENAL nephrometry score

Journal

BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages 708-718

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12580

Keywords

carcinoma; renal cell; disease-free survival; Stage 2; R; E; N; A; L; nephrometry; progression-free survival; nephrectomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveWe evaluated survival outcomes of partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) for clinical T2 renal masses (cT2RM) controlling for R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. Patients and MethodsA two-centre study comprised of 202 patients with cT2RM who underwent RN (122) or PN (80) between July 2002 and June 2012 (median follow-up 41.5 months). Kaplan-Meier analysis compared overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among the entire cohort and within categories of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score of 10 and <10. Association between procedure and PFS and OS was analysed using Cox-proportional hazard. ResultsThere were no significant differences between PN and RN in clinical T stage and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores. For RN and PN, the 5-year PFS was 69.8% and 79.9% (P = 0.115), CSS was 82.5% and 86.7% (P = 0.407), and OS was 80% and 83.3% (P = 0.291). Cox regression showed no association between RN vs PN and PFS; a R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score of 10 was associated with a shorter PFS (hazard ratio 6.69, P = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier analysis for RN vs PN showed no difference in PFS for entire cohort or within the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score categories of 10 and <10. The PFS was better for those with R.E.N.A.L nephrometry scores of <10 vs 10 (P < 0.001) and for cT2a vs cT2b tumours (P = 0.012). OS was no different between cT2a and cT2b tumours; patients with R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores of 10 were more likely to die from disease (P < 0.001) or any cause (P < 0.001) vs those with R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores of <10. ConclusionsPN may be oncologically effective for cT2RM. A R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score of 10 is negatively associated with OS among cT2RM compared with a score of <10 and provides additional risk assessment beyond clinical T stage. Further follow-up and prospective randomised investigation is requisite to confirm efficacy of PN for cT2RM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available