3.8 Review

Global energy governance: a review and research agenda

Journal

PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
DOI: 10.1057/palcomms.2015.47

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past few years, global energy governance (GEG) has emerged as a major new field of enquiry in international studies. Scholars engaged in this field seek to understand how the energy sector is governed at the global level, by whom and with what consequences. By focusing on governance, they broaden and enrich the geopolitical and hard-nosed security perspectives that have long been, and still are, the dominant perspectives through which energy is analysed. Though still a nascent field, the literature on GEG is thriving and continues to attract the attention of a growing number of researchers. This article reviews the GEG literature as it has developed over the past 10 years. Our aim is to highlight both the progress and limitations of the field, and to identify some opportunities for future research. The article proceeds as follows. First, it traces the origins of the GEG literature (section Origins and roots of GEG research). The subsequent sections deal with the two topics that have received the most attention in the GEG literature: Why does energy need global governance (section The goals and rationale of global energy governance)? And, who governs energy (section Mapping the global energy architecture)? We then address a third question that has received far less attention: How well or poor is energy governed (section Evaluating global energy governance)? In our conclusions (section Conclusions and outlook), we reflect on the current state of GEG, review recent trends and innovations, and identify some questions that warrant future consideration by scholars. This article is published as part of a thematic collection on global governance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available