4.6 Article

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer: evaluating treatment and survival in the National Cancer Data Base

Journal

BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages 719-726

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12601

Keywords

bladder cancer; radical cystectomy; bladder-sparing therapy; treatment outcome; urinary bladder neoplasms

Funding

  1. University Cancer Research Fund
  2. National Center for Research Resources
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [KL2TR001109, UL1TR001111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between patterns of care and patient survival for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) using a large, national database. Patients and MethodsWe identified a cohort of 36469 patients with MIBC (stage II) from 1998 to 2010 from the National Cancer Data Base. Patients were stratified into four treatment groups: radical cystectomy, chemo-radiation, other therapy, or no treatment. Overall survival (OS) among the groups was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log rank test. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was fit to evaluate the association between treatment groups and OS. ResultsIn all, 27% of patients received radical cystectomy, 10% chemo-radiation, 61% other therapy and 2% no treatment. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences by treatment group, with cystectomy having the greatest median OS (48 months) followed by chemo-radiation (28 months), other therapy (20 months), and no treatment (5 months). When controlling for multiple covariates, the OS for cystectomy was similar to that for chemo-radiation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98, 1.12), but superior to other therapy (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.35, 1.48), and no treatment (HR 2.40; 95% CI 2.12, 2.72). The OS time for chemo-radiation was superior to other therapy and no treatment. ConclusionsRadical cystectomy and chemo-radiation are significantly underused despite a substantial survival benefit compared with other therapies or no treatment. Future studies are needed to optimise care delivery and improve outcomes for patients with MIBC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available