4.4 Article

Picture fuzzy cross-entropy for multiple attribute decision making problems

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 491-502

Publisher

VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECH UNIV
DOI: 10.3846/16111699.2016.1197147

Keywords

multiple attribute decision making; fuzzy set; picture fuzzy set; picture fuzzy cross-entropy; picture fuzzy weighted cross-entropy; enterprise resource planning; system selection; C61

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61174149, 71571128]
  2. Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China [14YJCZH082, 15XJA630006]
  3. construction plan of scientific research innovation team for colleges and universities in Sichuan Province [15TD0004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we investigate the multiple attribute decision making problems with picture fuzzy information. The advantage of picture fuzzy set is easily reflecting the ambiguous nature of subjective judgments because the picture fuzzy sets are suitable for capturing imprecise, uncertain, and inconsistent information in the multiple attribute decision making analysis. Thus, the cross entropy of picture fuzzy sets, called picture fuzzy cross entropy, is proposed as an extension of the cross entropy of fuzzy sets. Then, a multiple attribute decision making method based on the proposed picture fuzzy cross entropy is established in which attribute values for alternatives are picture fuzzy numbers. In decision making process, we utilize the picture fuzzy weighted cross entropy between the ideal alternative and an alternative to rank the alternatives corresponding to the cross entropy values and to select the most desirable one(s). Finally, a practical example for enterprise resource planning system selection is given to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available