4.6 Article

Secondary bladder cancer after upper tract urothelial carcinoma in the US population

Journal

BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 110, Issue 9, Pages 1325-1329

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11108.x

Keywords

ureteroscopy; bladder cancer; upper tract urothelial cancer; bladder recurrence; Surveillance; Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)

Funding

  1. Doris Duke Charitable foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE To assess the natural history of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and the development of lower tract secondary cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with UTUC between 1975 and 2005 were identified within nine Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries. Baseline characteristics of patients with and without secondary bladder cancer were compared. A multivariate logistic regression model was fitted to test if the year of diagnosis predicted the likelihood of developing a secondary bladder cancer. RESULTS Of the 5212 patients with UTUC, 242 (4.6%) had a secondary bladder cancer (range: 1.7-8.2%). There was a mean interval of 26.5 (95% CI: 22.2-30.8) months between cancer diagnoses. Compared with those without secondary tumours, patients with secondary bladder malignancy were more likely to present with larger tumours (4.2 vs 3.1 cm, P < 0.001) and with tumours located in the ureter (P < 0.001). Year of diagnosis was not a predictor of the likelihood of having a secondary bladder malignancy in a multivariate analysis controlling for demographic and tumour characteristics (odds ratio: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.95-1.03) CONCLUSIONS Patients with larger urothelial tumours located in the ureter were those most likely to develop a secondary lower tract tumour. No longitudinal changes in the rate of secondary bladder cancer were noted among patients with UTUC over the 30-year study period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available