Journal
BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 110, Issue 9, Pages 1325-1329Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11108.x
Keywords
ureteroscopy; bladder cancer; upper tract urothelial cancer; bladder recurrence; Surveillance; Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)
Categories
Funding
- Doris Duke Charitable foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
OBJECTIVE To assess the natural history of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and the development of lower tract secondary cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with UTUC between 1975 and 2005 were identified within nine Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries. Baseline characteristics of patients with and without secondary bladder cancer were compared. A multivariate logistic regression model was fitted to test if the year of diagnosis predicted the likelihood of developing a secondary bladder cancer. RESULTS Of the 5212 patients with UTUC, 242 (4.6%) had a secondary bladder cancer (range: 1.7-8.2%). There was a mean interval of 26.5 (95% CI: 22.2-30.8) months between cancer diagnoses. Compared with those without secondary tumours, patients with secondary bladder malignancy were more likely to present with larger tumours (4.2 vs 3.1 cm, P < 0.001) and with tumours located in the ureter (P < 0.001). Year of diagnosis was not a predictor of the likelihood of having a secondary bladder malignancy in a multivariate analysis controlling for demographic and tumour characteristics (odds ratio: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.95-1.03) CONCLUSIONS Patients with larger urothelial tumours located in the ureter were those most likely to develop a secondary lower tract tumour. No longitudinal changes in the rate of secondary bladder cancer were noted among patients with UTUC over the 30-year study period.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available