4.6 Article

Benign prostatic hyperplasia: racial differences in treatment patterns and prostate cancer prevalence

Journal

BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 108, Issue 8, Pages 1302-1308

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09991.x

Keywords

benign prostatic hyperplasia; acute urinary retention; lower urinary tract symptoms; prostate cancer

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE To compare prostate cancer, prostate-related surgery and acute urinary retention rates, as well as associated healthcare resource use over 11 years in African American and Caucasian men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS The BPH-related medical and surgical charges and events were determined for 398 African American men and 1656 Caucasian men followed for a mean of 10.2 years within a health maintenance organization. Racial differences in clinical outcomes were evaluated using time-to-event analysis, stratifying results by baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values. RESULTS Risk of a prostate cancer diagnosis was 2.2 times greater in African American than Caucasian men (95% CI 1.48-3.35, P < 0.001) in analyses adjusting for serum PSA level. Although African Americans were more likely to receive medical therapy for symptoms of BPH than Caucasians (43.5% vs 37.2%, respectively; P = 0.029), there were no clinically meaningful differences with respect to subsequent acute urinary retention or BPH-related surgery between them, or BPH-related medical charges (US $407 vs US $405 per month). CONCLUSION As evidenced by this analysis of 'realworld' clinical practice, African Americans with BPH have a much greater risk of developing prostate cancer than similar Caucasian men highlighting the need for education and early detection in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available