4.6 Article

Risk stratification for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatment

Journal

BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages 876-880

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10041.x

Keywords

BPH; combined therapy; risk stratification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with BPH have traditionally been managed with 'sequential monotherapy' or effectively an intent to treat to failure. Thus watchful waiting strategies, alpha-blockers, 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors and surgical intervention have been seen as a stepwise progression based on failure of symptom control at each level. This paper reviews the evidence from large randomized trials which suggest a new approach of risk stratification, allowing the identification of higher risk patients for whom medical management can be optimised at an early stage. If this can be done at a primary care level, this could lead to a dramatic improvement in outcomes in men with BPH. center dot Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common cause of bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms. In the past, the aim of drug treatment was to relieve symptoms until surgery became necessary, predominantly using an alpha-blocker or a 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor (5ARI) as monotherapy. center dot Together with improving knowledge about the pathogenesis of BPH, there is now strong evidence from large randomized trials that risk stratification and appropriate treatment with combined alpha-blocker/5ARI therapy can significantly reduce the risk of disease progression and avoid long-term complications such as acute urinary retention and surgery. center dot BPH will increasingly be managed in primary care in the future and, if new management strategies based on this evidence are to be implemented cost effectively, there is a need to introduce shared care between the primary and secondary care sectors to optimise use of resources and expertise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available