4.6 Review

How to develop a simulation programme in urology

Journal

BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 108, Issue 11, Pages 1698-1702

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.010420.x

Keywords

urology; simulation; training; assessment; lifelong learning; revalidation

Funding

  1. MRC [G0600698] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0600698] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G0600698] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fixed performance-based outcomes of inanimate trainers and simulators have been praised as useful adjuncts in urology for reducing the learning curve associated with the acquisition of new technical and non-technical skills without compromising patient safety. Simulators are becoming an integral part of the urology training curriculum and their effectiveness is totally dependent on the structure of the programme implemented. The present paper discusses the fundamental concepts of centralized urology centres and their potential to serve as key adjuncts in the certification and validation process of urologists. In summary, proficiency-based curricula with well structured endpoints and objective tools for validating proficiency are critical in developing a simulation programme in urology. We concludes that more educational research into the outcomes of integrated urology curricula followed by trainee/trainer opinion surveys will help address some of these criteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available