4.6 Review

Progress and challenges of the bioartificial pancreas

Journal

NANO CONVERGENCE
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1186/s40580-016-0088-4

Keywords

Bioartificial pancreas; Macroencapsulation; Microencapsulation; Islet surface modification; Microfluidic; Micropatterning

Funding

  1. NIBIB [1R03EB017344-01]
  2. NHLBI [1R01HL125391-01]
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL125391] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R03EB017344] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pancreatic islet transplantation has been validated as a treatment for type 1 diabetes since it maintains consistent and sustained type 1 diabetes reversal. However, one of the major challenges in pancreatic islet transplantation is the body's natural immune response to the implanted islets. Immunosuppressive drug treatment is the most popular immunomodulatory approach for islet graft survival. However, administration of immunosuppressive drugs gives rise to negative side effects, and long-term effects are not clearly understood. A bioartificial pancreas is a therapeutic approach to enable pancreatic islet transplantation without or with minimal immune suppression. The bioartificial pancreas encapsulates the pancreatic islets in a semi-permeable environment which protects islets from the body's immune responses, while allowing the permeation of insulin, oxygen, nutrients, and waste. Many groups have developed various types of the bioartificial pancreas and tested their efficacy in animal models. However, the clinical application of the bioartificial pancreas still requires further investigation. In this review, we discuss several types of bioartificial pancreases and address their advantages and limitations. We also discuss recent advances in bioartificial pancreas applications with microfluidic or micropatterning technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available