4.5 Article

Effects of intratracheally instilled laser printer-emitted engineered nanoparticles in a mouse model: A case study of toxicological implications from nanomaterials released during consumer use

Journal

NANOIMPACT
Volume 1, Issue -, Pages 1-8

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2015.12.001

Keywords

Nanoparticles; Laser printers; Inflammation; Epigenetics

Funding

  1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
  2. Consumer Protection Safety Commission [212-2012-M-51174]
  3. National Institute of Health [HL007118, 1P20GM109005, R01ES021764]
  4. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences/National Institute of Health Clinical and Translational Science Award [UL1TR000039, KL2TR000063]
  5. Arkansas Biosciences Institute
  6. Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Proceeds Act
  7. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR000039, KL2TR000063] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [T32HL007118] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [R01ES021764] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P20GM109005] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Incorporation of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) into toners used in laser printers has led to countless quality and performance improvements. However, the release of ENMs during printing (consumer use) has raised concerns about their potential adverse health effects. The aim of this study was to use real world printer-emitted particles (PEPs), rather than raw toner powder, and assess the pulmonary responses following exposure by intratracheal instillation. Nine-week oldmale Balb/cmicewere exposed to various doses of PEPs (0.5, 2.5 and 5mg/kg bodyweight) by intratracheal instillation. These exposure doses are comparable to real world human inhalation exposures ranging from 13.7 to 141.9 h of printing. Toxicological parameters reflecting distinct mechanisms of action were evaluated, including lung membrane integrity, inflammation and regulation of DNA methylation patterns. Results from this in vivo toxicological analysis showed that while intratracheal instillation of PEPs caused no changes in the lung membrane integrity, there was a pulmonary immune response, indicated by an elevation in neutrophil and macrophage percentage over the vehicle control and lowdose PEPs groups. Additionally, exposure to PEPs upregulated expression of the Ccl5 (Rantes), Nos1 and Ucp2 genes in themurine lung tissue and modified components of the DNA methylation machinery (Dnmt3a) and expression of transposable element (TE) LINE-1 compared to the control group. These genes are involved in both the repair process from oxidative damage and the initiation of immune responses to foreign pathogens. The results are in agreement with findings from previous in vitro cellular studies and suggest that PEPs may cause immune responses in addition to modifications in gene expression in the murine lung at doses that can be comparable to real world exposure scenarios, thereby raising concerns of deleterious health effects. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available