4.6 Article

Gene expression of forkhead transcription factors in the normal and diseased human prostate

Journal

BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 103, Issue 11, Pages 1574-1580

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08351.x

Keywords

Forkhead transcription factors; FOXF1; FOXF2; FOXD1; prostate cancer; benign prostate hyperplasia

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, ZonMw [908-02-032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assess the expression of forkhead transcription factors (FOX) in normal prostate and prostate diseases, as since the first FOX was identified, its family members have been implicated in a variety of cellular processes, including embryonic development and disease. We analysed a set of 12 different FOX genes by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in prostate zones, prostate cancer, lymph node metastases, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), xenografts and several prostate cell lines. There were striking differences among the expression of various FOX family members; most prominent were the high expression of FOXF1 and FOXF2 in the normal prostate transition zone and BPH, and their decreased expression in prostate cancer. Interestingly, although the FOXF genes are stroma-specific, some of the androgen-independent prostate cancer xenografts uniquely express these two genes. FOXD1 and FOXD2 were more highly expressed in prostate cancer and lymph node metastases. FOXA1 and FOXC1 have an opposite expression pattern for androgen-dependent growth of prostate cancer cell lines and xenografts. Various members of the FOX family are differentially expressed in the zones of the normal prostate and in benign and malignant outgrowths. The expression profiles of FOXF1 and FOXF2 suggest a role in epithelial to mesenchymal transition, while FOXA1 and FOXC1 expression is linked to androgen-associated growth status of cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available