3.8 Article

Consumers' luxury value perception in the Brazilian premium beer market

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WINE BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 369-386

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJWBR-09-2015-0043

Keywords

Surveys; Consumer behaviour; Luxury; Structural equation models; Brewing

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the consumers' luxury value perception in Brazilian premium beer market. Design/methodology/approach - Data from a survey of 418 Brazilian consumers were used to test the research model. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the reliability and validity of the measurement model, and the structural equation modeling was used to analyze the consumers' luxury value perception. Findings - The analytical results showed that the dimensions of social, individual and functional values featured items with high significance. For the fourth dimension (financial value), just one item presented relevance. Along with it, correlation between dimensions was analyzed. All four dimensions have higher significance and great estimates. Research limitations/implications - This research was executed in a single country environment. Practical implications - Results suggest that the only significant item to the consumers' luxury value perception in the dimension of financial value is the higher price of premium beers. Other dimensions are well fit for the premium beer market. Originality/value - To present date, marketing literature in the beer issue approaches its consumption as an economic phenomenon. This paper develops a notion that beer consumption can also be approached in a luxury consumption perspective. The framework developed in this paper can assist future researchers to consider consumption of different types and levels of beer, based on luxury value perception.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available