3.8 Article

Three Risk-elicitation Methods in the Field: Evidence from Rural Senegal

Journal

REVIEW OF BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 145-171

Publisher

NOW PUBLISHERS INC
DOI: 10.1561/105.00000046

Keywords

Risk-elicitation; Laboratory experiments in the field; Comprehension; Rural Senegal

Categories

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development
  2. IFPRI Mobile Experimental Economics Laboratory (IMEEL)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the past decade, it has become common to use simple laboratory games and decision tasks as a device for measuring risk preferences in the developing world. In this paper, we build on existing taxonomies for risk-elicitation and discuss pros and cons of using such methods in developing-country contexts. We use three distinct risk-elicitation mechanisms (the Holt-Laury task, the Gneezy-Potters mechanism, and a non-incentivized willingness-to-risk scale) and subjects from rural Senegal. Our study provides some guidance to researchers wishing to use risk-elicitation mechanisms in the rural developing world.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available