4.7 Article

Towards supply chain sustainability: economic, environmental and social design and planning

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 105, Issue -, Pages 14-27

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.052

Keywords

Closed-loop supply chain; Environmental impact; Social benefit; Multi-objective; Location model

Funding

  1. Portuguese National Science Foundation (FCT) [SFRH/BD/51947/2012, SFRH/BPD/63668/2009, PTDC/SEN-ENR/102869/2008, PEst-OE/MAT/UIO297/2011, PTDC/EMS-SIS/1982/2012]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/51947/2012] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Costumers and governments are pressuring companies to become more sustainable. However, the lack of research on how to incorporate these issues makes this a challenging task. To fill this gap a generic multi-objective mathematical programming model for the design and planning of supply chains, integrating the three dimensions of sustainability is presented. The economic pillar of sustainability is addressed in this work considering the costs of the supply chain. Then ReCiPe, an environmental assessment methodology, indicated in the literature and by the European Commission as the most developed one currently available, is for the first time applied to supply chain design optimization. Finally, a social indicator appropriate to assess strategic decisions is proposed. This social indicator considers the impact of social and political concerns on company's performance. The relevance of this model as a decision support system is highlighted with its application to a real case study of a Portuguese battery producer and distributor. A set of strategies to select the best solution among the obtained optimal ones is presented. Results show that the model allows improvements in all the three dimensions of sustainability and offers important managerial insights. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available